Microsoft
New video game consoles? Already?
Yes and no: It looks like we’ve got until at least 2020 before the successor to the Xbox One arrives. That’s according to the latest rumors, which line up nicely with many of the details shared publicly by Microsoft’s head of Xbox, Phil Spencer.
Between repeated reports from Brad Sams at Thurott and Spencer’s statements, we have a surprisingly clear picture of Microsoft’s plans for the next Xbox consoles. Here’s what we know so far:
In 2017, Microsoft unveiled and released the Xbox One X — a $500, far more powerful version of the Xbox One. Above, Xbox chief Phil Spencer announces the price and release date of the Xbox One X in June 2017.YouTube/Xbox
In a surprise move, Xbox leader Phil Spencer outright announced Microsoft’s work on the successor to the Xbox One.
“The same team that delivered unprecedented performance with Xbox One X is deep into architecting the next Xbox consoles,” he said on stage in Los Angeles on June 10. “Where we will once again deliver on our commitment to set the benchmark for console gaming.”
Spencer offered more information on the announcement during an interview with Giant Bomb’s Jeff Gerstmann the same week. “Everybody knows what’s happening,” Spencer said in reference to Sony and Microsoft making new consoles. “It’s this kind of unsaid thing, of, like, ‘Well, they shipped Xbox One X. They didn’t lay off their whole hardware team. What do you think they’re doing?'”
He said the announcement was a means of easing potential concerns of longtime console buyers: “It’s not tomorrow, but I didn’t want people to think that we’re walking away from that part of the brand and the business, because it’s really important to us.”
In terms of what that console (or consoles) will actually be, Spencer isn’t offering any major details just yet.
Microsoft
Of note, Spencer said “consoles” on stage — as in Microsoft is apparently working on more than one future console.
Rumors point to Microsoft creating two new Xbox consoles that co-exist within the same generation: A smaller, less expensive Xbox, used primarily for streaming video games; and a larger, more traditional, more expensive Xbox that could power games locally (or stream them).
Notably, Microsoft doesn’t currently offer a streaming service for video games — but one is in the works.
“Our cloud engineers are building a game streaming network to unlock console-quality gaming on any device,” Spencer said on stage in June. “Not only that — we are dedicated to perfecting your experience everywhere you want to play. On your Xbox, your PC, or your phone.”
It’s an echo of sentiments he’s expressed previously, but it’s the most definitive testament to Microsoft’s plans for the future of gaming.
“There are 2 billion people who play video games on the planet today. We’re not gonna sell 2 billion consoles,” Spencer told me in an interview following his stage presentation in June. “Many of those people don’t own a television, many have never owned a PC. For many people on the planet, the phone is their compute device,” he said. “It’s really about reaching a customer wherever they are, on the devices that they have.”
That said, logic dictates that the ability to stream “console-quality gaming on any device” depends on some pretty major upgrades to internet speeds around the world. It also faces hurdles like the uncertain future of net-neutrality laws and consumer internet data caps.
Microsoft’s answer to those potential problems is the “Azure” cloud platform, an infrastructure that few other companies have. “Fifty data centers in different parts of the planet? Billions of dollars of investment in building that out? It allows us to accelerate our growth in this space,” Spencer told me.
NBC/”Saturday Night Live”
When the Xbox One was in development, it was codenamed Durango (and occasionally “Kryptos”). In the case of the new Xbox consoles — and the cloud streaming service as well, according to Thurott’s Brad Sams — the codename is “Scarlett.”
What that means is anyone’s guess.
Microsoft
If there’s one thing Microsoft is lacking, it’s major first-party game franchises. Even if such franchises existed, Microsoft only owns so many studios capable of producing blockbuster games.
“Halo” and “Forza” and “Gears of War” are all important franchises — to say nothing of “Minecraft,” still one of the biggest games on the planet. With the exception of “Minecraft,” many of these franchises are suffering from franchise fatigue.
Sony’s PlayStation 4 and Nintendo’s Switch, meanwhile, are getting huge first-party games — games that can only be played on their respective consoles — like “God of War” and “Super Mario Odyssey” that re-invented staid franchises.
And that’s why Microsoft bought five game studios. “We know that we want to create new franchises,” Spencer told me in June. “We really thought we needed five or six new teams, and products that we really believed in.”
Spencer announced the quintet of studio purchases on stage in June — part of the company’s presentation outlining the future of Xbox.
“We are committed to building an industry-leading first-party studios organization,” Spencer said on stage. “And we are making one of our greatest single year investments in teams by adding five new creative studios.”
Why not buy one big publisher, like EA or Activision, with a bunch of major game franchises? It’s complicated, but here’s Spencer’s answer: “I couldn’t find a collection out there in one entity to do it.”
Langdock raises $3M with General Catalyst to help businesses avoid vendor lock-in with LLMs
What Robert Durst did: Everything to know ahead of ‘The Jinx: Part 2’
This nova is on the verge of exploding. You could see it any day now.
India’s election overshadowed by the rise of online misinformation
This camera trades pictures for AI poetry
CesiumAstro claims former exec spilled trade secrets to upstart competitor AnySignal
Screen Skinz raises $1.5 million seed to create custom screen protectors
Dating culture has become selfish. How do we fix it?
