Connect with us

Politics

Trump takes aim at Don McGahn, Mueller report in early tweetstorm

Published

on

In a tweetstorm early Friday morning, President Donald Trump appeared to take aim at one of the most prominent people featured in the special counsel Robert Mueller’s redacted report in the Russia investigation.

“Statements are made about me by certain people in the Crazy Mueller Report, in itself written by 18 Angry Democrat Trump Haters, which are fabricated & totally untrue,” the president tweeted. “Watch out for people that take so-called ‘notes,’ when the notes never existed until needed.”

Trump added: “I never agreed to testify, it was not necessary for me to respond to statements made in the ‘Report’ about me, some of which are total bulls— & only given to make the other person look good (or me to look bad). This was an Illegally Started Hoax that never should have happened…”

In his tweets, the president appeared to be referring to the former White House counsel Don McGahn, who took extensive notes of his conversations with the president, according to Mueller’s report.

McGahn told prosecutors that Trump called him twice and ordered him to tell then-acting attorney general Rod Rosenstein that Mueller had conflicts of interest and needed to be removed.

McGahn said he agreed to do so to get off the phone, but that he planned to resign rather than carry out Trump’s directive.

Read more:The 11 biggest takeaways from the Mueller report

He then told Reince Priebus and Stephen Bannon — who at the time were respectively White House chief of staff and chief strategist — of his plans to quit. Priebus told prosecutors McGahn didn’t provide any more information, other than saying Trump had asked him to “do crazy s—.”

Later, Trump asked McGahn about notes he had taken of their meetings, according to Mueller’s report.

“Lawyers don’t take notes,” McGahn recalled Trump saying. “I never had a lawyer who took notes.”

McGahn replied that he took notes because he was a “real lawyer” and that notes create a written record and are not a bad thing.

Trump then said, “I’ve had a lot of great lawyers, like Roy Cohn,” according to McGahn. “He did not take notes.”

Cohn served as chief counsel to Sen. Joseph McCarthy during the infamous 1954 “red scare” hearings where the Wisconsin Republican sought to root out supposed communist elements in the U.S. military.

In subsequent decades, Cohn counseled Trump as early as the 1970s when the future president was beginning his rise as a New York real estate magnate. In 1986, Cohn was disbarred for ethics violations and died later that year.

White House Counsel Donald McGahn and President Donald Trump.
Andrew Harnik/AP

McGahn was a central figure in Mueller’s obstruction-of-justice case against Trump, and he voluntarily sat down for over 30 hours of interviews with the special counsel’s office last year.

Trump’s legal team, moreover, is said to have been particularly worried about what McGahn may have told Mueller about his conversations with the president. Indeed, he was referenced in multiple portions of the Mueller report which laid out potentially incriminating evidence of obstruction by Trump.

Read more:White House counsel Don McGahn refused the president’s order to publicly deny that Trump ordered him to fire Mueller

Mueller’s report landed with a bang on Thursday. Attorney General William Barr said in his initial review of Mueller’s findings that the investigation did not establish that the Trump campaign conspired with the Russian government.

Barr also made his own determination that Trump did not obstruct justice after Mueller declined to make a “traditional prosecutorial judgment” on the matter.

Trumpworld seized on the attorney general’s statements — which he repeated in congressional testimony and during a controversial news conference Thursday morning — and said they vindicated the president and were a “complete and total exoneration” of him.

But Mueller’s report painted a more nuanced picture.

Read more:Mueller says Trump was unsuccessful in influencing the Russia investigation — but mostly because his aides didn’t follow orders

In the obstruction thread, Barr told reporters on Thursday Mueller’s decision was not influenced by Justice Department guidelines that say a sitting president cannot be indicted. He said Mueller’s determination — or lack thereof — was prompted by the inconclusive nature of the evidence.

But in his report, Mueller did not cite the evidence as a reason he did not come to a decision on obstruction. He did, however, cite the policy against charging a sitting president.

Moreover, the special counsel’s team said (emphasis ours) that “if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state.” The team continued: “Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, however, we are unable to reach that judgment.”

The report did say, as Barr mentioned, that Mueller’s investigation did not find a Trump-Russia criminal conspiracy.

But prosecutors prefaced that finding with a significant caveat: “The investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and … the Campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts.”

Barr made no mention of that finding by prosecutors in his initial summary of the report, in a subsequent letter to Congress, during several days of testimony before Congress, or at his Thursday press conference.

Continue Reading
Advertisement Find your dream job

Trending