Politics
Judge says yes, Trump can be sued. Trump Foundation lawsuit continues

President
Donald Trump speaks to reporters following his teleconference
with troops from his Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Fla.,
Thursday, Nov. 22, 2018.
Associated
Press/Susan Walsh
- The lawsuit filed against President Donald Trump, the Donald
J. Trump Foundation, and his children Ivanka Trump, Eric Trump,
and Donald Trump Jr., alleging misuse of charity funds, will move
forward. - Justice Saliann Scarpulla of the New York State Supreme Court
issued a ruling on Friday, rejecting the notion that President
Trump cannot face a suit while in office. - Lawyers for the Trump Foundation made several arguments to
get the case dismissed, including on the grounds that “a sitting
president could not be sued,” according to the 27-page ruling. - The suit, as described in Friday’s ruling, alleges the
“misuse of charitable assets and self-dealing” and that “the
Foundation and its board members have transacted business
illegally and abusively over a number of years.”
The
lawsuit filed against President Donald Trump, the Donald J.
Trump Foundation, and his children Ivanka Trump, Eric Trump, and
Donald Trump Jr., alleging misuse of charity funds, is allowed to
move forward.
Justice Saliann Scarpulla of the New York State Supreme Court
issued a ruling on Friday, allowed the lawsuit to proceed and
rejected the notion that President Trump cannot face such legal
action while in office.
Lawyers for the Trump Foundation made several arguments to get
the case dismissed, including on the grounds that “a sitting
president could not be sued,” according to the 27-page ruling.
However, Judge Scarpulla, citing decisions in Clinton v.
Jonesand Zervos v. Trump, stated that she did have
jurisdiction and allowed the case to move forward.
The lawsuit was initially filed in June by the New York State
Attorney General Barbara Underwood. The suit, as described in
Friday’s ruling, alleges the “misuse of charitable assets and
self-dealing” and that “the Foundation and its board members have
transacted business illegally and abusively over a number of
years.” The New York attorney general’s office is arguing that
Trump, the foundation, Ivanka, Donald Jr., and Eric violated both
state and federal law.
Specific allegations include using charitable assests that mostly
consisted of outside donations to settle legal obligations,
“purchase personal items,” and “advance Mr. Trump’s presidential
election.”
The Washington Post initially dug into the financials of the
Trump Foundation during the campaign in 2016.
The New York Attorney General’s office then began its
investigation, initially under former Attorney General Eric
Schneiderman (a Trump antagonist). Schneiderman
resigned in May of 2018 after multiple women accused him of
abuse. Underwood took over the investigation and filed the suit
in June.
The suit seeks to dissolve the foundation, bar Trump from heading
a charitable organization for a decade, bar Ivanka, Eric, and
Donald Jr. from leading a nonprofit for a year, and obtain
recompense of $2.8 million plus penalties.
Following the initial suit, Trump lashed out on Twitter,
suggesting that it was political and vowing “I won’t settle this
case!”
The sleazy New York Democrats, and their now disgraced (and run out of town) A.G. Eric Schneiderman, are doing everything they can to sue me on a foundation that took in $18,800,000 and gave out to charity more money than it took in, $19,200,000. I won’t settle this case!…
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 14, 2018
A statement from the foundation called the suit, “politics at its
very worst.”
“The Foundation has donated over $19 million to worthy charitable
causes — more than it even received,” a spokesperson for the
Trump Foundation said back in June. “The President himself — or
through his companies — has contributed more than $8 million. The
reason the Foundation was able to donate more than it took in is
because it had little to no expenses. This is unheard of for a
charitable foundation.”
On Friday, lawyer for the Trump Foundation Alan Futerfas said,
“The decision means only that the case goes forward. As we have
maintained throughout, all of the money raised by the Foundation
went to charitable causes to assist those most in need. As a
result, we remain confident in the ultimate outcome of these
proceedings.”
INSIDER contacted the Trump Organization for comment.
A statement from AG Underwood’s office said, “We welcome Justice
Scarpulla’s decision, which allows our suit to move forward.”
“As we detailed in our petition earlier, the Trump Foundation
functioned as little more than a checkbook to serve Mr. Trump’s
business and political interests,” the statement continued.
“There are rules that govern private foundations — and we intend
to enforce them, no matter who runs the foundation.”
-
Entertainment7 days ago
10 documentaries to watch on Netflix if you want to learn something new
-
Entertainment4 days ago
These holiday movies are included with your Amazon Prime membership
-
Business3 days ago
The Urban.Us and BMW Mini accelerator focused on urban innovation names its latest cohort
-
Business3 days ago
Brazil’s new fintech startup Cora raised $10 million on the strength of its founding team
-
Politics5 days ago
Boris Johnson said patients should be charged to use NHS services
-
Politics3 days ago
How the 2010s established a path to better capitalism in the US
-
Business5 days ago
Atomico Partner Tom Wehmeier reviews ‘The State of European Tech’ 2019 report
-
Social Media5 days ago
Daily Crunch: Facebook announces photo transfer tool