Connect with us

Featured

Prince Harry hits back after charity reported to watchdog over ‘conflicts of interest’ | UK News

Published

on

Campaigners have reported the Duke and Duchess of Sussex and the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge’s foundations to the Charity Commission, in a move branded “deeply offensive” by Prince Harry’s legal team.

Republic, which campaigns for an elected head of state, alleged that funds were transferred from one royal foundation to another because of the “personal relationship” between the two patrons.

It accused the organisations of “inappropriate use of charitable funds, conflicts of interest and lack of independence”.

A spokesperson for Prince Harry said the claims were “salaciously created” and “false”.

“To this point, it is deeply offensive to today see false claims made about the Duke of Sussex and his charitable work. It is both defamatory and insulting to all the outstanding organisations and people he has partnered with,” they said.

Graham Smith, Republic’s chief executive, claimed the Royal Foundation – William and Kate’s organisation – gave a £145,000 grant to Sussex Royal and £144,901 to Travalyst, Prince Harry’s not-for-profit sustainable travel organisation.

Duke and Duchess of Cambridge who have lent their support to a Public Health England initiative to boost the nation's mental health during the coronavirus pandemic
Image:
William and Kate’s organisation is alleged to have given a six-figure grant to Sussex Royal

In his letter to the Charity Commission, he wrote: “In both instances, it appears the only rationale for the decision was the personal relationship between two patrons, the Duke of Sussex and the Duke of Cambridge.

“Neither patrons are trustees of the Royal Foundation, so there is also a question mark over the independence of the trustees of the Royal Foundation.

“The Sussex Royal charity has since decided to close, and it is reported that they will transfer all their funds to Travalyst.

“Again, this appears to be a personal decision by a trustee [the Duke of Sussex] to fund another of his projects, rather than to ensure the funds are being used for the original purposes for which they were donated.”

Prince Harry’s legal team said the royal had never had any “personal financial interest” and that all of his charitable work had been “transparent and above board”.

“To suggest otherwise is unequivocally wrong and will be acted upon accordingly with the weight of the law,” they added.

“The avenue through which this was publicly and salaciously created only suggests a hunger for media attention as well as a shared and attacking agenda, which is neither right nor just.”

The two couples had initially formed a joint charity, which was behind national campaigns including the Heads Together mental health project.

But in June last year, Harry and Meghan announced they would split from the organisation to form their own charity, Sussex Royal.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex
Image:
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have stepped down as senior royals

Since then, the Sussexes have stepped down from their roles as senior royals – choosing financial and personal freedom instead – and the Sussex Royal organisation has become defunct.

They are now establishing a new foundation called Archewell, named after their child Archie.

A spokesperson who worked with the Sussex Royal foundation said: “Grants made to the non-profit organisation Travalyst are for the ongoing development of projects that will support communities, wildlife, and the environment through sustainable travel and tourism.

“All grants have been made impartially and objectively, fully in line with governance requirements, and have been reported transparently in full accordance with regulations.”



Prince Harry and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, arrive for the annual Commonwealth Service at Westminster Abbey



Harry and Meghan’s royal farewell

A Royal Foundation spokeswoman said: “The grants made to Sussex Royal were to support the charitable work of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.

“They were fully in line with governance requirements and were reported transparently.”

The Charity Commission said it had received a complaint and is assessing whether it will need to investigate.

“We have not made any determination of wrongdoing,” it said.

Advertisement Find your dream job

Trending