Finance
Five ways Trump’s moves to stem asylum seekers have hit hurdles
(Reuters) – Grappling with a ballooning number of mostly Central American families seeking asylum at the US-Mexico border, President Donald Trump has suggested increasingly bold steps to limit protections for this group and stem their entry into the United States.
Yet many of his administration’s ideas have been hindered by legal, practical and political obstacles.
Increasingly frustrated, Trump on Monday issued a presidential memorandum directing officials to make it harder for asylum seekers to apply for work permits and to charge them application fees — drawing immediate fire from the United Nations.
The proposals face a potentially lengthy regulatory review and once rules are issued they may be subject to legal challenges. Many asylum protections are codified in US and international law.
Meanwhile, the flow of migrants continues to swell. In March, the monthly number of people apprehended and deemed inadmissible at the US-Mexico border surged to more than 100,000, the highest level in more than a decade.
Migration is largely driven by poverty, corruption, crime and other factors in Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador where the bulk of people are coming from.
Some examples of administration proposals or policies that have run or may run into trouble:
-
Business7 days ago
Google Gemini: Everything you need to know about the new generative AI platform
-
Entertainment5 days ago
Hands-on with the Claude AI app: It’s pleasant to use, but janky
-
Business5 days ago
Haun Ventures is riding the bitcoin high
-
Entertainment6 days ago
‘Bridgerton’: Everything you need to remember before Season 3
-
Entertainment3 days ago
Apple Watch Series 9 vs. SE: A smartwatch skeptic tested both for 13 days
-
Entertainment4 days ago
5 essential gadgets for turning your home into a self-care sanctuary
-
Business4 days ago
Apple: pay attention to emerging markets, not falling China sales
-
Business3 days ago
Google dubs Epic’s demands from its antitrust win ‘unnecessary’ and ‘far beyond the scope’ of the verdict