Business
Should your new VC fund use revenue-based investing?
You’re working on launching a new VC fund; congratulations! I’ve been a traditional equity VC for 8 years, and I’m now researching revenue-vased investing and other new approaches to VC. The question I’m asking myself: should a new VC fund use revenue-based investing, traditional equity VC, or possibly both (likely from two separate pools of capital)?
Revenue-based investing (“RBI”) is a new form of VC financing, distinct from the preferred equity structure most VCs use. RBI normally requires founders to pay back their investors with a fixed percentage of revenue until they have finished providing the investor with a fixed return on capital, which they agree upon in advance.
This guest post was written by David Teten, Venture Partner, HOF Capital. You can follow him at teten.com and @dteten. This is part of an ongoing series on Revenue-based investing VC that will hit on:
From the investors’ point of view, the advantages of the RBI models are manifold. In fact, the Kauffman Foundation has launched an initiative specifically to support VCs focused on this model. The major advantages to investors are:
- Shorter duration, i.e., faster time to liquidity. Typically RBI VCs get their capital back within 3 to 5 years.
-
Business7 days ago
Why Apple’s ‘Crush’ ad is so misguided
-
Business6 days ago
Women in AI: Rep. Dar’shun Kendrick wants to pass more AI legislation
-
Business5 days ago
Healthy growth helps B2B food e-commerce startup Pepper nab $30 million led by ICONIQ Growth
-
Entertainment3 days ago
‘Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga’ review: George Miller’s blazing action folktale might just have outdone ‘Fury Road’
-
Entertainment4 days ago
‘House of the Dragon’ Season 2 trailer breakdown: Dragons, Rook’s Rest, and more
-
Business7 days ago
U.K. agency releases tools to test AI model safety
-
Entertainment5 days ago
Apple iPad Pro 2024 (13-inch) review: The battery life is bonkers
-
Entertainment3 days ago
Sex education is under threat in the UK. What’s going on?